Commencing hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Centre’s August 2019 decision to scrap Jammu & Kashmir’s special status by hollowing Article 370, the Supreme Court on Wednesday focused on the most basic question — how the constitutional provision, explicitly referred to as temporary, assumed permanence to prohibit its annulment.
Commencing hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Centre’s August 2019 decision to scrap Jammu & Kashmir’s special status by hollowing Article 370, the Supreme Court on Wednesday focused on the most basic question — how the constitutional provision, explicitly referred to as temporary, assumed permanence to prohibit its annulment. from Times of India https://ift.tt/XTdaMlu
Commencing hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Centre’s August 2019 decision to scrap Jammu & Kashmir’s special status by hollowing Article 370, the Supreme Court on Wednesday focused on the most basic question — how the constitutional provision, explicitly referred to as temporary, assumed permanence to prohibit its annulment. from Times of India https://ift.tt/XTdaMlu
Comments
Post a Comment